The Relationship Between Ancient Greece and Rome

They also developed youthful genres, including satire, and placed great importance on the art of cajolery" (Roberts 50).

If we look at The Iliad, we can see what is meant by historic narrative. In The Iliad, we are treated to the get along of Troy and its leader, bullyrag, Priam's son. Hector's plight in The Iliad is one involving a choice between in the flesh(predicate) glory and community survival. The community was all all-important(prenominal) to Greek society and Hector will only retain face-to-face honor if he is able to accept his community responsibilities. Hector is torn between his love of family and his love of aver, both ideals to the Greeks as they would later be to the Ro pieces. However, Hector is impulsive and has a outcome of action based on personal not common glory. He rashly kills Patroklos which signifies the fall of Troy in this historic narrative. Hector realizes his lapse in judgment and knows the only modal value to regain honor is to give himself up for the good of the community. He knows this is in vain, but he knows he is damned for current if he does not. Thus, he says to Priam and Hekabe "Now, since by my own recklessness I have ruined my people, / I feel shame in advance the Trojans and the Trojan women with trailing / robes, that someone who is less of a man

The state was extremely important in both Greece and Rome. We owe to the Greeks the advent of the city-state and large humankind events during which festivals and religious rites were held. Rome would build the state into an conglomerate, and with the reign of Augustus emperors were forever given the title of chief priest. Altars that had been erected in honor of the Senate during the majority rule were now redirected to the emperor. Taxation, though unpopular, allowed for conquest, maintenance and empire building. The military was a finely polished tool for this purpose, though it changed as a lot throughout its history as did Roman civilization. As the empire grew, emperors became despotic monarchs and largely controlled and ignored the Roman people and the Senate.

Corruption, sparing vulnerability, too-great expansion and enemies helped bring Rome to its knees eventually "The Roman wolfram virtually disappeared by 500" (Roberts 127). However, Plato had very firm ideas or so the nature of the state and the republic. He might have predicted the fall of Rome because he insisted that only philosophers who had been well-trained for years in the acquaintance of the highest good were fit to rule the state. Only they could rule the state without serving personal aims over the good of the community?the very theme we saw in our previous discussion of The Iliad. In The Republic, Plato gives us through Socrates' narration the conditions of the ideal state. Thrasymachus initially argues that "I declare justice is nothing but the advantage of the stronger", a theory that would eventually cause Rome and its emperors and armies to fall (Rouse 137). Plato argues for a class-oriented state. The philosophers rule, the warriors protect, and the commoners seek their needs. The communal ends are best achieved to Plato when each and any human being is doing what he does best, the thing most fitted for the overall good of the state. However, Plato knows absolute power has a tendency to
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.