Blake - "The Tygre"

It is too bad that William Blake did not have the National geographical channel. If he had, he would know that the Tiger is no more evil than any other member near the filch of the food chain. It kills slower animal because that is the circle of life. There is no hidden, spiritual agenda. In his poem, The Tyger, Blake poses the question of who created the fearsome beast. The implication is that, any Deity capable of creating the precious lamb should be questioned virtually his or her motivation for building a killer. Perhaps Blake was difficult to shed some light on what he considered to be the evil nature of man. However, by using two diametrically opposed images (The Lamb and the Tygre), I think Blake misses a break in opportunity. Yes, the Tiger is a natural predator with vicious cleaning instincts… It will also care for its young as any mother might and protect the pride from outside threat. On the other hand, a sheep once bit me at my uncles farm, and it hurt like crazy. My point is this; all Gods creatures are capable of both good and evil.



We choose to be good or bad. I get the feeling that Blake is act to answer a very big question with an apples-to-oranges comparison.

1. Blake borrows from the biblical representation of the Lion and the Lamb. However, in the biblical context, the two images dole out something other than the good vs. evil. What do he images represent, and how could Blake have make a better case for his intended message.

2. Would his question look more symbolism if he had simply juxtaposed the beast itself, as I suggest?If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .