Testing of Osteoporosis

A total of 7 vicenary analyses were performed in the assaying of hypothesis offspring two. expert acceptance of hypothesis public figure two required that the results of solely seven quantitative analyses be statistic whollyy significant at p<.05, and that the relevant soft touch means for the experimental group be great than those for the control group. Partial acceptance of hypothesis number two required that the results of fourtosix of the quantitative analyses be statistically significant at p<.05, and that the score means convoluted in each of those fourtosix analyses be greater for the experimental group than for the control group. A finding of statistical significance at p<.05 for less than four of the seven quantitative analyses required the rejection of hypothesis number two.

A total of triad quantitative analyses were performed in the examinationing of hypothesis number three. across-the-board acceptance of hypothesis number three required that the results of all three quantitative analyses be statistically significant at p<.05, and that the relevant score means for the experimental group be greater than those for the control group. Partial acceptance of hypothesis number three required that the results of two of the quantitative analyses be statistically significant at p<.05, and that the score means involved in each of t

A major methodological limitation of this fill involved the selection and reputation of the inquiry take. The experimental group deep down the research sample was drawn from a suburban study characterized by mid(prenominal)tohigh income levels, which the control group was drawn from an urban argona characterized by a low income level. The literature is replete with studies indicating that income levels are a significant explanatory variable with respect to health care awareness, health care knowledge, selfcare cerebrate to health care, acquiring and retaining knowledge related to health care, and levels of wellness.

The skewing of the subgroups within the research sample in this study with respect to income levels, therefore, creates a potential doubt with respect to the validity and reliability of the study data in the context of population representativeness. Thus, the findings of this study may not be assumed to be generalizable beyond the research sample for this study.

The results of the analysis of variance found that the differences in the posttest score means between the experimental and control groups were statistically significant at p<.021. As posttest score mean for osteoporosisrelated benefits to be gained from atomic number 20 intake was higher(prenominal) for the experimental group than for the control group, as indicated in confuse 49, that portion of the hypothesis that held that elderly women receiving instruction concerning osteoporosis would dupe stronger health care beliefs related to the osteoporosisrelated benefits to be derived from calcium intake than would women receiving no such instruction, by inference, was supported.

Difference + 10.55  46.10 56.65

Pretest and posttest osteoporosis susceptibility score means for two the experimental and control groups are presented in Table 43, which may be found on the following page. The ANOVA results are presented in Table 44, which also may be found on the following page. The results of th
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.