The movement started number 1 around the busing issue in Montgomery, Alabama, but it was also the closing of decades of frustration nearly a century after the hard worker era and after a long history of go on discrimination and ill-treatment. The successes of the movement were uneven. Social class divisions within the foul community widened as the movement progressed and achieved some of its goals. There was a growing distinction apparent between the middle- and upper-class commonwealth that was benefiting from an improved business and employment situation and from greater educational opportunities on the one hand, and the scummyer classes in the ghettoes of the city and in countryfied regio
ns on the other. The latter assembly consisted of people who did not benefit directly from the changes taking graze and who were frustrated that the benefits enjoyed by some were not making both changes in their lives. There were social divisions in the white community as well, with white society showing different responses to the racial dissension and agitation in the black community. Some banking engages took an sprightly part in trying to develop "black capitalism." The brass as a whole tried to contain the explosiveness of the situation. racialism was never only a Southern problem, and it was now acclivitous more and more clearly in the North as blacks made advances and some whites became alarmed at the changes taking place.
The busing of children to make up racial imbalance in the schools caused a great manage of dissension, especially in urban working-class neighborhoods, as short(p) whites and poor blacks were pushed into competition with one another for scarce educational resources. The movement of the black population into traditionally white neighborhoods came as employment situations improved, but this also caused a reaction from the poor and middle-class whites who felt threatened or who thought that their station values were threatened. The rich were seen as being able to pillow aloof from the problem while the poor and middle-class exercise the brunt of the changes (Zinn, 1980, 435-459).
Let us not shy away from the obvious here. The head of the nation's police force was protecting the national interest by using intimate tapes to wreak havoc in a man's marriage. As the Bureau had done before, though with inexpert lies, with the marriages of left-wing activists and right-wing racists. But this was not only a highly bizarre and obscene initiative; it was plainly illegal. under(a) federal law, government agencies may not disclose tape-recorded or bugged conversations to a third party (Gentry, 1991, 572-573).
The strife between Hoover and King started when the F
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment