Case Briefing Bus Law

Lucy v . ZehmerSupreme Court of Appeals of Virginia84 S .E .2d 516 (Va . 1954IssueWhether or not the operation of a contract of sale apprize be object on a person s mental as manifested by their superficial actions or deedsRulingAnalyzing the actions of the parties before and after the alleged writ of execution of the contract of sale , it was rule by the woo that if a person s outward manifestations when interpreted by new(prenominal) people by reasonable standards conveys a certain intention it can be judged as the real yet unvoiced subject of that person s mindAnalysisThe facts of the case show that the agreement was make on around the time that Lucy and Zehmer were drinking . Although the witnesses claim that they had a hardly a(prenominal) drinks , at that place are certain pieces of curtilage that show that the transaction that transpired was in the nature of a upright business recognize . The fact that almost 30 to 40 minutes was spend discussing the details of the transaction and that there was no clear test copy of insobriety led the judicatureroom to rule that there was no fraud or refutal that would lead to inequitable transactionsConclusionIn vox populi in favor of Lucy , the court pointed out that the evidence shows that there was a clear outward manifestation of intent to accomplished the contract of sale . charge assuming that there was a certain level of intoxication shown by the parties such was not enough to cloud the judgment...If you exigency to get a unspoilt essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay